Tony Notte (36)

★ Div 1 Rep Batting – Middle-Order Batter U15 (2004/05) WA
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Midland-Guildford Cricket Club
Age: Born on/after 1 Sep 1989 (inferred from U15 eligibility, 2004/05 season)
Green Shield: 0 season(s) played · last GS year 2005/06 (ages out of U16 after this)
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
29/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Proficient
46/100
Batting Proficient
47/100
Bowling Part Time
~24/100
discounted — banded on wickets per match

Representative pathway — 7 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Division 1 representative (+4)
  • ● Premier or state pathway — 8 matches (+3.2)
  • ● Body of work — 8 imported matches (+0.2)

Critical recommendations

medium Batting
Too many aerial dismissals

6 of 8 dismissals caught. Review shot selection — particularly lofted drives and pulls early in the innings. Train hitting along the ground until set.

medium Bowling
Tight but not threatening

Economy of 2.49 is excellent but a wicket every 52 balls is slow. Develop a genuine wicket-taking variation and attack the stumps more.

Strengths

How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 46 × 40% · Batting 47 × 30% · Bowling 24 × 30%. Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.78 for the level played (Rep Div 1 8). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 4 catches + 1 run outs (1 direct, 0 assisted) in 8 matches — 0.62 per match.
Batting
191 runs in 9 innings, adjusted average 23.6. Qualifies on the floors (avg ≥ 20, SR ≥ 40).
Bowling
4 wickets in 5 matches bowled in (of 8 played) — 0.80 per match at 21.8, economy 2.49, strike rate 52.5.

Fielding — imported matches (8)

4
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0.5
Catches / match
1
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
5
Total dismissals
0.63
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

191
Runs (9 inns)
23.58
Avg (adj)
—
Strike rate
62
High score
1
Not outs
5
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

4
Wickets (35 ov)
2.49
Economy
21.75
Average
8
Maidens
0
Extras / over
52.5
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 8 imported
Batting 191 runs in 9 inns @ 23.58 (SR —)
Milestones 0×100, 2×50, HS 62, 0 ducks
Bowling 4 wkts @ 21.75 (econ 2.49, SR 52.5)
Best / 5WI 2-23 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 4 ct, 1 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 5 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.5
Catches / match
0.63
Dismissals / match

Across 8 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2005/06 4 0 162 62 40.5 — 2 0
2004/05 4 1 23 12 7.19 — 0 0
2003/04 1 0 6 6 6 — 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2005/06 1 0 9 0 — 9 —
2004/05 29 7 61 3 20.33 2.1 58
2003/04 5 1 17 1 17 3.4 30

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2005/06 1 0 0 0 1
2004/05 2 0 1 0 3
2003/04 1 0 0 0 1
Pathway benchmark

How does Tony compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.