Daniel Xantidis (33)

★ Div 1 Rep All-Rounder – Bowling U19 (2011/12) VIC
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: North Ringwood Cricket Club · Croydon Cricket Club · Fitzroy Doncaster Cricket Club · Ringwood District Cricket Association Inc.
Age: Born on/after 1 Sep 1992 (inferred from U19 eligibility, 2011/12 season)
Green Shield: 0 season(s) played · last GS year 2008/09 (ages out of U16 after this)
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
12/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Proficient
46/100
Batting Proficient
40/100
Bowling Advance
63/100

Representative pathway — 4 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Division 1 representative (+4)
  • ● Body of work — 10 imported matches (+0.2)

Critical recommendations

medium Batting
Too many aerial dismissals

8 of 9 dismissals caught. Review shot selection — particularly lofted drives and pulls early in the innings. Train hitting along the ground until set.

info Fielding
Fielding is a selection weapon

0.40 catches per match is elite for this level — keep it visible by taking the hardest catching positions in big games.

Strengths

  • ✓ Genuine wicket-taker — bowling average of 12.9.
  • ✓ Strikes regularly — a wicket every 19 balls.
How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 46 × 40% · Batting 40 × 30% · Bowling 63 × 30%. Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.30 for the level played (Club 10). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 4 catches + 1 run outs (1 direct, 0 assisted) in 10 matches — 0.50 per match.
Batting
245 runs in 10 innings, adjusted average 27.0. Qualifies on the floors (avg ≥ 20, SR ≥ 40).
Bowling
15 wickets in 10 matches — 1.50 per match at 12.9, economy 4.05, strike rate 19.1.

Fielding — imported matches (10)

4
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0.4
Catches / match
1
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
5
Total dismissals
0.5
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

245
Runs (10 inns)
26.95
Avg (adj)
—
Strike rate
79
High score
1
Not outs
2
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

15
Wickets (47.7 ov)
4.05
Economy
12.87
Average
7
Maidens
0.13
Extras / over
19.1
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 10 imported
Batting 245 runs in 10 inns @ 26.95 (SR —)
Milestones 0×100, 2×50, HS 79, 0 ducks
Bowling 15 wkts @ 12.87 (econ 4.05, SR 19.1)
Best / 5WI 5-7 · 1 five-fors
Fielding 4 ct, 1 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 5 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.4
Catches / match
0.5
Dismissals / match

Across 10 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2012/13 1 0 14 14 14 — 0 0
2011/12 9 1 231 79 28.52 — 2 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2012/13 4 0 15 2 7.5 3.75 12
2011/12 43.7 7 178 13 13.69 4.08 20.2

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2011/12 4 0 1 0 5
Pathway benchmark

How does Daniel compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.