Anthony Jackson

Bowling – First-Change Bowler
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Likely same player — one-click merge
play.cricket
Anthony Jackson
WA · 22 matches · 25% match
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Jan Juc Cricket Club · Woodford Cricket Club
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
3/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
16/100
Batting Working on Basics
not rated — working on basics
Bowling
Not enough data

Representative pathway — 0 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Body of work — 11 imported matches (+0.2)

Critical recommendations

high Fielding
Catching return too low for selection

Only 0.09 catches per match over 11 matches. Fielding is the first thing selectors compare when batting/bowling are close — make catching the priority: 30 high balls + 30 flat catches per session, and ask to field in the ring/slips where chances come.

medium Batting
High duck rate

Out for 0 in 11% of imported innings. Build a repeatable start routine: watch the ball out of the hand, score first run with low-risk pushes.

Strengths

How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 16 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling not rated (weight redistributed). Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.30 for the level played (Club 11). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 1 catches + 1 run outs (1 direct, 0 assisted) in 11 matches — 0.18 per match.
Batting
Not rated: 9 innings at 22.1 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
Bowling
Not rated: 8 wickets from 11.0 overs across 4 matches bowled in (of 11 played) — 0.73 per match, under the 0.25 floor. Bowls too rarely to judge.

Fielding — imported matches (11)

1
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0.09
Catches / match
1
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
2
Total dismissals
0.18
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

149
Runs (9 inns)
22.07
Avg (adj)
—
Strike rate
85
High score
3
Not outs
7
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

8
Wickets (11 ov)
3.91
Economy
5.38
Average
1
Maidens
0
Extras / over
8.3
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 11 imported
Batting 149 runs in 9 inns @ 22.07 (SR —)
Milestones 0×100, 1×50, HS 85, 1 ducks
Bowling 8 wkts @ 5.38 (econ 3.91, SR 8.3)
Best / 5WI 4-16 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 1 ct, 1 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 2 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.09
Catches / match
0.18
Dismissals / match

Across 11 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2012/13 1 1 11 11* 11 — 0 0
2010/11 4 0 35 30 8.75 — 0 0
2009/10 1 1 6 6* 6 — 0 0
2008/09 2 0 91 85 45.5 — 1 0
2007/08 1 1 6 6* 6 — 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2012/13 9 0 34 7 4.86 3.78 7.7
2010/11 2 1 9 1 9 4.5 12

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2012/13 1 0 0 0 1
2010/11 0 0 1 0 1
Pathway benchmark

How does Anthony compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.