Jamie Lawler

All-Rounder – Bowling WA
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Likely same player — one-click merge
play.cricket
Jamie Lawler
WA · 1 matches · 75% match
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Swan Athletic - Caversham Cricket Club · Midland Cricket Club · High Wycombe Cricket Club
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
3/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
16/100
Batting Proficient
53/100
Bowling
Not enough data

Representative pathway — 0 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Body of work — 19 imported matches (+0.4)

Critical recommendations

medium Batting
High duck rate

Out for 0 in 21% of imported innings. Build a repeatable start routine: watch the ball out of the hand, score first run with low-risk pushes.

Strengths

  • ✓ Consistent run-scorer — adjusted average 34.7.
  • ✓ Proven ability to go big — 1 hundred(s), best of 169.
  • ✓ Safe hands — 7 catches in 19 matches (0.37 per match), a genuine selection asset.
How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 16 × 40% · Batting 53 × 30% · Bowling not rated (weight redistributed). Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.30 for the level played (Club 19). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 7 catches + 0 run outs (0 direct, 0 assisted) in 19 matches — 0.37 per match.
Batting
570 runs in 19 innings, adjusted average 34.7. Qualifies on the floors (avg ≥ 20, SR ≥ 40).
Bowling
Not rated: 10 wickets from 42.7 overs across 8 matches bowled in (of 19 played) — 1.25 per match, under the 0.25 floor. Bowls too rarely to judge.

Fielding — imported matches (19)

7
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0.37
Catches / match
0
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
7
Total dismissals
0.37
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

570
Runs (19 inns)
34.74
Avg (adj)
—
Strike rate
169
High score
3
Not outs
5
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

10
Wickets (42.7 ov)
3.35
Economy
14.3
Average
5
Maidens
0.35
Extras / over
25.6
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 19 imported
Batting 570 runs in 19 inns @ 34.74 (SR —)
Milestones 1×100, 4×50, HS 169, 4 ducks
Bowling 10 wkts @ 14.3 (econ 3.35, SR 25.6)
Best / 5WI 3-30 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 7 ct, 0 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 7 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.37
Catches / match
0.37
Dismissals / match

Across 19 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2020/21 1 1 11 11* 11 — 0 0
2016/17 2 1 67 56* 50.25 — 1 0
2015/16 6 1 320 169* 62.22 — 2 1
2009/10 4 0 37 17 9.25 — 0 0
2008/09 6 0 135 56 22.5 — 1 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2020/21 12 0 35 2 17.5 2.92 36
2016/17 5 3 5 2 2.5 1 15
2015/16 24.7 2 93 6 15.5 3.77 24.7
2008/09 1 0 10 0 — 10 —

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2016/17 3 0 0 0 3
2009/10 2 0 0 0 2
2008/09 2 0 0 0 2
Pathway benchmark

How does Jamie compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.